Cases 1 - 10 of 11
England v. City of Glasgow, Kentucky
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Barbara England
Defendant:
City of Glasgow, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Ison v. Metlife
as 3:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ison
Defendant:
Metlife
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hines v. The Hartford
as 3:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
Barbara Hines
Defendant:
The Hartford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blankenship v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 4:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Barbara Blankenship
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Davis v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 5:2014cv00222
Plaintiff:
Barbara Davis
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bustos et al v. Quality Restaurant Concepts, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Candice Bustos , Stephanie Prewitt , Deanna Cornett and others
Defendant:
Quality Restaurant Concepts, LLC and Nathan Bunger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Burgher v. Verizon South, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jean Burgher
Defendant:
Verizon South, Inc. , Verizon Communications Inc. and Marsh & McClennan Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Albritton v. Pepsico, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00715
Plaintiff:
Barbara Albritton
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Robinson v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00275
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc. , Dollar General Partners , Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Guy v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 3:2009cv00551
Plaintiff:
Barbara Michelle Guy and Barbara Michelle Guy
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
