Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Northwest Indiana Painters Welfare Fund et al v. Bowen's Decorating Service Inc
as 2:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Northwest Indiana Local 460 District Council 91, IUPAT, AFL-CIO , Jim Loftis , James Mitchell, Sr and others
Defendant:
Bowen's Decorating Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00458
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Mitchell et al v. Bowen's Decorating Service Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell, Sr , Henry Sierra , Rod McDonald and others
Defendant:
Bowen's Decorating Service Inc and Stephen A Bowen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOWEN v. SODEXO, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01859
Plaintiff:
MARY BOWEN
Defendant:
DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE, RICHARD JACKSON and SODEXO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MCCLESKEY et al v. BOWEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION
as 1:2012cv01526
Defendant:
BOWEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS and MARK MCCLESKEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Helm et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01206
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Acevez, Frederick R. Aldrich, Merlin Alexander and others
Defendant:
Alderwoods Group, Inc., Alderwoods Group, LLC, Paul A. Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
LAUER et al v. BOWEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION et al
as 1:2009cv00036
Plaintiff:
MIKE LAUER, MIKE LAUER, STEVE YEAGER and others
Defendant:
BOWEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION and DOUG BOWEN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DeLange et al v. Bowen's Decorating Service Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00171
Plaintiff:
Allan DeLange, Allan DeLange, William Blumm and others
Defendant:
Bowen's Decorating Service Inc and Stephen A Bowen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
