Labor Cases filed in New Jersey
BRENNAN v. DORMIE NETWORK LLC et al
as 1:2021cv11777
Plaintiff: ROBERT BRENNAN
Defendant: DORMIE NETWORK LLC doing business as HIDDEN CREEK GOLF CLUB, JEFF COWAN and JOHN DOES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CHISOLM v. BRENNAN
as 2:2020cv13968
Plaintiff: FAIRLYNN CHISOLM
Defendant: MEGAN J. BRENNAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HUNT v. BRENNAN et al
as 2:2019cv13347
Defendant: MEGAN J. BRENNAN and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff: PATRICIA D. HUNT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CHAMBERLAIN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv04941
Plaintiff: CHERYL CHAMBERLAIN
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS LOCAL BRANCH 370, JASON AUSBORN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
ROMANO v. BRENNAN, et al
as 2:2016cv04653
Plaintiff: MARIE A ROMANO
Defendant: MEGAN J. BRENNAN, FAUSTO (PAT) ALBUJA and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
STEAMFITTERS PENSION, SURETY, WELFARE, EDUCATION AND VACATION FUNDS LOCAL UNION NO. 475 AND THEIR TRUSTEES v. T.M. BRENNAN CONTRACTORS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01074
Plaintiff: STEAMFITTERS PENSION, SURETY, WELFARE, EDUCATION AND VACATION FUNDS LOCAL UNION NO. 475 AND THEIR TRUSTEES
Defendant: T.M. BRENNAN CONTRACTORS, INC. and JAC MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
TEANECK POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION LOCAL 215 et al v. TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
as 2:2009cv06339
Plaintiff: TEANECK POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION LOCAL 215, GERARD ROSANO, JOHN ABRAHAM and others
Defendant: TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BRENNAN v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 1:2009cv01037
Plaintiff: JOHN BRENNAN
Defendant: LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?