Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Johnson v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Chester L Johnson
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2021at01159
Plaintiff:
Chester L Johnson
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California et al v. Chester Bross Construction Company et al
as 4:2019cv08140
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local 3 Heavy And Highway Trust, Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 Vacation, Holiday and Sick Pay Trust Fund, Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California and others
Defendant:
Chester Bross Construction Company and Mark Bross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Carney
as 3:2015cv04323
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plastering Industry Pension Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Plasterers Local Union No. 66 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Wilbert Theodis Carney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Hinds Bros. Company, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02387
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plastering Industry Pension Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Plasterers Local Union No. 66 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Fund and others
Trustee:
Chester Murphy
Defendant:
Hinds Bros. Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Davidson Plastering, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02386
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plastering Industry Pension Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Plasterers Local Union No. 66 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Davidson Plastering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. K.V.F., Inc.
as 3:2015cv00790
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plastering Industry Pension Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Plasterers Local Union No. 66 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Fund and others
Trustee:
Chester Murphy
Defendant:
K.V.F., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Board Of Trustees Of The Northern California Plasterers Joint Apprenticeship And Training Trust Fund
as 3:2015cv00788
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plasterers Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the Northern California Plastering Industry Pension Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the Plasterers Local Union No. 66 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Board Of Trustees Of The Northern California Plasterers Joint Apprenticeship And Training Trust Fund
Trustee:
Chester Murphy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 E.R.I.S.A. Collection of Delinquent Trust Funds
Erik Maitland et al v. Audio Visual Services Group, Inc. et al.
as 2:2014cv05619
Defendant:
Audio Visual Services Group, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Summers Chester and Erik Maitland
Antonio Acfalle et al v. DIRECTV Inc et al
as 2:2013cv08108
Plaintiff:
Antonio Acfalle, Ernesto Alanis, Jr, Eric Aldrich and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV Inc, DIRECTV LLC, DTV Home Services II LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
