Cases 1 - 9 of 9
COX v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv05166
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COX
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY doing business as THE HARTFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
SINKUS v. COX et al
as 2:2022cv04584
Plaintiff:
BETH SINKUS
Defendant:
MINDI COX and O.C. TANNER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Cox v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02013
Plaintiff:
Paul Cox
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Local Union 401, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
COX et al v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2015cv02610
Plaintiff:
BRIAN COX and RAQUEL COX
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER , ANN DUKE , ROBIN PURNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COX v. KILLION & SONS WELL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2014cv01325
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW COX
Defendant:
KILLION & SONS WELL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cox v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2014cv00731
Plaintiff:
Paul Cox
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BAILEY et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv05372
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BAILEY , STACY BAILEY BAILEY , KELLIE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relation
FARLEY et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH
as 2:2012cv01149
Plaintiff:
EDMUND J. FARLEY , ROBERT J. COX and HARRY J. SCHERER
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. COX et al
as 2:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
YOLANDA COX, GREGORY E. DAVIS, MELISSA V. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
