Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Johnson-Oleksiak v. Plains ER Management Harco, Ltd. et al
as 6:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Danielle S Johnson-Oleksiak
Defendant:
Plains ER Management Harco, Ltd., Daniel Akers, Chloe Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
The Estate of Debra Walls v. Billy Chandler Jr et al
as 3:2021cv01952
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Debra Walls
Defendant:
Billy Chandler, Jr doing business as B&B Pawn Superstores agent of Savinmoney123 and Reba Chandler doing business as B&B Pawn Superstores agent of Savinmoney 123
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gonzalez v. Chandler et al
as 3:2019cv01232
Defendant:
Reba Chandler and Billy Chandler, Jr
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Gonzalez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clark v. Chandler et al
as 3:2018cv02790
Defendant:
Reba Chandler and Billy Chandler, Jr
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Clark
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Edgefield Holdings as assignee of Regions Bank v. Gilbert et al
as 4:2017cv00657
Plaintiff:
Edgefield Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Gilbert , Helen K. Gilbert , Chandler Estates, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cardenas v. Chandler et al
as 4:2016cv02631
Plaintiff:
Judith Cardenas
Defendant:
Lewis Chandler and Sherry Chandler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fozard v. C R England & Sons Inc
as 3:2016cv01334
Plaintiff:
Chandler Fozard
Defendant:
C R England & Sons Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chandler v. Kayden Industries (USA) Inc
as 4:2015cv03314
Plaintiff:
Chad Chandler
Defendant:
Kayden Industries (USA) Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chandler v. SNC-Lavalin Engineers & Constructors, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00784
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
SNC-Lavalin Engineers & Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cox v. Austin County, Texas et al
as 4:2014cv03122
Plaintiff:
Ernest Cox , Vicki Minyard , Charles Holmes and others
Defendant:
Austin County, Texas and Jack Brandes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
