Labor Cases filed in Pennsylvania
ADAMS et al v. RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01124
Plaintiff: MARCUS ADAMS and CONRAD EVERETT
Defendant: RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC and RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC doing business as BRANDPOINT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Conrad v. The Hershey Company
as 1:2013cv02283
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Conrad
Defendant: The Hershey Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CONRAD v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2010cv00257
Plaintiff: KAREN CONRAD
Defendant: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and VERIZON/HEWITT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1332
G.A. & F.C. Wagman, Inc. et al v. Conrad Siegel Actuaries et al
as 1:2009cv00144
Plaintiff: G.A. & F.C. Wagman, Inc. and Construction Management Resources, Inc.
Defendant: Conrad Siegel Actuaries and Glenn Hafer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
ADAMS et al v. THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 5:2008cv04257
Plaintiff: ROY ADAMS, CARL ANDRZIESKI, MICHAEL ARROYO and others
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Labor None
MERRANKO et al v. PRIORITY ONE MEDICIAL TRANSPORT, INC., et al.
as 2:2008cv01146
Plaintiff: KELLY ANN MERRANKO, WILLIAM G. WAGER, JASON GRADY and others
Defendant: PRIORITY ONE MEDICAL TRANSPORT, INC., PRIORITY ONE MEDICAL TRANSPORT, INC., SANDRA L. KOLESAR-PEPPLER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Dino et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01493
Plaintiff: Jay T. Dino, Michael J. Proce, Robert N. Booterbaugh and others
Defendant: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections and Jeffrey A. Beard, PH.D.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?