Cases 1 - 3 of 3
William L. Pender v. Bank of America Corporation
as 17-1485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. MCCORKLE and WILLIAM L. PENDER
Plaintiff:
ANITA POTHIER, KATHY L. JIMENEZ, MARIELA ARIAS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, NA, BANK OF AMERICAN PENSION PLAN and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY, John and Jane Does #1-50, Former Directors of NationsBank Corporation and Current and Former Directors of Bank of America Corporation & John & Jane Does #51-100, Current/Former Members of the Bank of America Corporation Corporate Benefit, PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS, LLP, CHARLES K. GIFFORD and others
Willam L. Pender v. Bank of America Corporation
as 14-1011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. MCCORKLE and WILLIAM L. PENDER
Plaintiff:
ANITA POTHIER, KATHY L. JIMENEZ, MARIELA ARIAS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, NA, BANK OF AMERICAN PENSION PLAN and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY, John and Jane Does #1-50, Former Directors of NationsBank Corporation and Current and Former Directors of Bank of America Corporation & John & Jane Does #51-100, Current/Former Members of the Bank of America Corporation Corporate Benefit, CHARLES K. GIFFORD, JAMES H. HANCE, JR. and others
William Pender v. Bank of America Corporation
as 11-1668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. MCCORKLE and WILLIAM L. PENDER
Plaintiff:
ANITA POTHIER, KATHY L. JIMENEZ, MARIELA ARIAS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, NA, PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS, LLP and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY, John and Jane Does #1-50, Former Directors of NationsBank Corporation and Current and Former Directors of Bank of America Corporation & John & Jane Does #51-100, Current/Former Members of the Bank of America Corporation Corporate Benefit, CHARLES K. GIFFORD, JAMES H. HANCE, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
