Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hagen v. Pitney Bowes Inc Employee Benefits Committee
as 2:2020cv00615
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hagen
Defendant:
Pitney Bowes Inc Employee Benefits Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Halperin v. Richards, et al
as 1:2019cv01561
Defendant:
Stout Risius Ross Inc, Kerry S Arent, Kathi P Seifert and others
Plaintiff:
Alan D Halperin and Eugene I Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Benoskie v. Kerry Foods Inc
as 2:2019cv00684
Defendant:
Kerry Foods Inc. and Kerry Foods Inc
Plaintiff:
Kathy Benoskie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Appvion Inc Retirement Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan v. Buth et al
as 1:2018cv01861
Defendant:
Wendy Kaplan, Debra Fantini, Stephen Seifert and others
Plaintiff:
Appvion, Inc. Retirement Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Appvion Inc Retirement Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Cox v. AMRI Counseling Services LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01285
Defendant:
AMRI Counseling Services LLC , AMRI Counseling Services Inc and Lakeia Jones
Plaintiff:
Kathy Cox
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jacowski, Kathy v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00657
Plaintiff:
Kathy J. Jacowski
Defendant:
Kraft Foods Group, Inc. , Aetna Life Insurance Company and Kraft Foods Group, Inc. Employee-Paid Group Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Rueschman, Kathy v. American United Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2011cv00241
Plaintiff:
Kathy Rueschman
Defendant:
American United Life Insurance Company and Disability Reinsurance Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SPOERLE, JEFF v. KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC.
as 3:2007cv00300
Plaintiff:
JEFF SPOERLE, JEFF SPOERLE, NICK LEE and others
Defendant:
KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC., OSCAR MAYER FOODS DIVISION and KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC., OSCAR MAYER FOODS DIVISION
Movant:
Corina Kritz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
