Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Tebo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv20911
Plaintiff:
Pamela Tebo
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Slutsky v. Plotkin
as 0:2023cv61416
Plaintiff:
Marie Danielle Slutsky
Defendant:
Pamela Ann Plotkin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gillard v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
as 8:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Pamela Gillard
Defendant:
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Bailey v. HSDI International LLC et al
as 0:2023cv60707
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bailey
Defendant:
HSDI International LLC, Sayo Isaac Daniel and Hortencia Isaias Daniel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gillard v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
as 8:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
PAMELA GILLARD
Defendant:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Loftin v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 8:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
PAMELA LOFTIN
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MELARA v. MAMACITA'S, INC. et al
as 0:2022cv61367
Plaintiff:
PAMELA MELARA
Defendant:
MAMACITA'S, INC. and MARIA NARVAEZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
ARNOLD v. SPINAL CARE PLUS PA et al
as 5:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lisa Arnold
Defendant:
Spinal Care Plus, P.A., Michael Colvin, Pamela McLure and others
Weston v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 8:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Pamela Weston
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ray v. Adams and Associates, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60154
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ray
Defendant:
Adams and Associates, Inc., Othniel McDowell and Mary Geoghegan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
