Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MAHONEY v. MONTAGUE REAL ESTATE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MAHONEY
Defendant:
MONTAGUE REAL ESTATE, INC., MONTEGUE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC doing business as CENTURY 21 MONTAGUE, CASTLEWOOD ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
MONTEGUE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cassino v. Property Management Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01949
Plaintiff:
Lenina Cassino
Defendant:
Property Management Enterprises, LLC doing business as The Apartment Gallery and Vincent Sibol
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
ZAVALA CERRATO et al v. EVERTS et al
as 2:2020cv02601
Defendant:
EVERTS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, BROTHERS PROPERTIES, LLC, TODD R. EVERTS and others
Plaintiff:
ROSA N. ZAVALA and SERGIO ZAVALA CERRATO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Sabo v. REO Property Management, LLC
as 3:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sabo
Defendant:
REO Property Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BARROWS v. COMMUNITY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2014cv02999
Plaintiff:
JAMES BARROWS
Defendant:
COMMUNITY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND et al v. MURWIN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LP et al
as 5:2013cv05501
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND and JOSEPH J. SAMOLEWICZ
Defendant:
MURWIN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LP, DRE CORPORATION, ALLIED LANDSCAPE & CONTRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
EINHORN v. APEX EQUIPMENT COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv05500
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. EINHORN
Defendant:
APEX EQUIPMENT COMPANY, ALLIED CONCRETE & SUPPLY CORPORATION, MURWIN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WACHTLER v. NSG PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv04197
Plaintiff:
NICK WACHTLER
Defendant:
NSG PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, NATHAN GLUCK and SUSAN GLUCK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
