Cases 1 - 10 of 213
Intertek Resource Solutions, Inc. v. Work
as 4:2024cv01678
Plaintiff:
Intertek Resource Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Work
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Sabrsula v. EOG Resources, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
Chad Sabrsula
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tibbs v. El Toro Resources, LLC
as 5:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Wendell Tibbs
Defendant:
El Toro Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Castillo et al v. Jan Resources, LLC
as 7:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Elias V. Castillo and Martin Levang
Defendant:
Jan Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Casarez v. Henry Resources, LLC
as 7:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Carlos Casarez
Defendant:
Henry Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. BCFS Health & Human Services et al
as 5:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Makeul Williams
Defendant:
BCFS Health & Human Services, Pluribus Resources and National Emergency Management and Response
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 Maximum Hours
Arthur v. Texas Health Resources
as 4:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
David Arthur
Defendant:
Texas Health Resources
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hurd v. JAN Resources, LLC
as 7:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Rhyan Hurd
Defendant:
JAN Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Bateman v. Concho Resources, Inc.
as 4:2023cv02091
Plaintiff:
Ty Bateman
Defendant:
Concho Resources, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
RUDTUK Operating LLC and Ally Consulting LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
