Cases 1 - 5 of 5
UPMC ERISA REVIEW COMMITTEE v. SURMAN et al
as 2:2020cv01897
Defendant:
ANTHONY SURMAN and D'AMICO LAW OFFICES, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
UPMC ERISA REVIEW COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHRISTOPHER v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CLAIMS REVIEW COMMITTEE et al
as 5:2015cv02697
Plaintiff:
ARLENEA CHRISTOPHER
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CLAIMS REVIEW COMMITTEE and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
KIRCHGESSNER v. UPS CLAIMS REVIEW COMMITTEE et al
as 5:2013cv02634
Plaintiff:
PAMELA J. KIRCHGESSNER
Defendant:
UPS CLAIMS REVIEW COMMITTEE and UPS NATIONAL HEALTH PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FULLER v. BAYER CORPORATION ERISA REVIEW COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL HR, BENEFITS DEPARTMENT
as 3:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
GEORGE FULLER, JR.
Defendant:
BAYER CORPORATION ERISA REVIEW COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL HR, BENEFITS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
RENFRO et al v. UNISYS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv02098
Plaintiff:
MARK RENFRO, MARK RENFRO, MARK RENFRO and others
Defendant:
UNISYS CORPORATION, UNISYS CORPORATION, UNISYS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
