Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Robert Patterson v. Robert Half International, Inc et al
as 8:2023cv02361
Plaintiff:
Robert Patterson
Petitioner:
Robert Half International, Inc
Defendant:
Omega Accounting Solutions, Inc. and DOES 1-25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Trustees on Behalf of Teamsters Benefit Trust v. Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02393
Plaintiff:
Trustees on Behalf of Teamsters Benefit Trust
Defendant:
Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Sikes v. Patterson
as 2:2020cv00717
Plaintiff:
Amanda Sikes
Defendant:
Andrew L. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Patterson v. Rosendin Electric, Inc.
as 4:2019cv05529
Defendant:
Rosendin Electric, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sterling Patterson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Northwest Adminstrators, Inc., v. Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
as 2:2019mc00098
Defendant:
Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc.
Abdeljabbar et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2018cv07482
Plaintiff:
Odeh Abdeljabbar, Eder Berganza, Dexter Baldridge II and others
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Trustees on Behalf of Teamsters Benefit Trust v. Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
as 2:2018cv02450
Defendant:
Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trustees on Behalf of Teamsters Benefit Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Northwest Administrators, Inc. v. Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
as 2:2017at00995
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators, Inc.
Defendant:
Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Northwest Administrators, Inc. v. Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
as 2:2017mc00143
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators, Inc.
Defendant:
Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lisa Patterson v. Shire US Inc et al
as 2:2016cv05778
Defendant:
Does, Shire US Inc and Shire plc
Plaintiff:
Lisa Patterson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
