Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WATSON v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2021cv19102
Plaintiff:
KIM WATSON
Defendant:
POSTMASTER GENERAL LOUIS DEJOY and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HUNT v. BRENNAN et al
as 2:2019cv13347
Defendant:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA D. HUNT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 3:2016cv06474
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMAL HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CHAMBERLAIN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al.
as 1:2016cv04941
Plaintiff:
CHERYL CHAMBERLAIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS LOCAL BRANCH 370, JASON AUSBORN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
HORTON v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2016cv03911
Plaintiff:
JOHN HORTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
FRIZELL v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2014cv01569
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA FRIZELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE , ANGELIQUE T. RENNA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOCAL 308, NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 3:2013cv06581
Plaintiff:
LOCAL 308, NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2009cv06535
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO and SOUTH JERSEY AREA LOCAL, AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
QUIJIJE v. POTTER et al
as 2:2009cv06454
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS S. QUIJIJE
Defendant:
JOHN E. POTTER and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
