Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BURKE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00325
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BURKE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOWEN et al v. FLOWERS FOODS INC et al
as 1:2020cv00410
Defendant:
CK SALES CO LLC, LEPAGE BAKERIES PARK STREET LLC and FLOWERS FOODS INC
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAMPBELL, MIKE DESCHENES, JAMES SNOW and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SHORTILL v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv00190
Defendant:
MARK ANTHOINE, UNUM CORPORATION, HEALEY & ASSOCIATES and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SHORTILL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BROWN v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA et al
as 2:2019cv00140
Defendant:
MUTUAL OF OMAHA and SEAFAX INC
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E BROWN, JR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MCKENZIE v. R&E ASSOCIATES et al
as 2:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN MCKENZIE
Defendant:
R&E ASSOCIATES, THOMAS WELLMAN, STRATEGIC EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICES OF NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. ROOF SYSTEMS OF MAINE
as 1:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E PEREZ
Defendant:
ROOF SYSTEMS OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HEATH v. JEWELL & BULGER PA et al
as 2:2015cv00268
Plaintiff:
NANCY HEATH
Defendant:
JEWELL & BULGER PA, PAUL S BULGER, ESQ and THOMAS F JEWELL, ESQ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
PEREZ v. SEAVEYS FURNITURE & APPLIANCE INC et al
as 2:2014cv00533
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E PEREZ
Defendant:
SEAVEYS FURNITURE & APPLIANCE INC and TIMOTHY W SEAVEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. PORTLAND MAINE AREA LOCAL NO 458 AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
as 2:2014cv00320
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E PEREZ
Defendant:
PORTLAND MAINE AREA LOCAL NO 458 AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
THOMAS v. ADECCO USA INC
as 1:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY THOMAS
Defendant:
ADECCO USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
