Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Herrera v. National Vision, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01350
Plaintiff:
Daniel Herrera
Defendant:
National Vision, Inc. doing business as Americas Best Contacts and Eyeglasses, Does 1 to 100, inclusive, National Vision, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 lm Removal- Labor/Mgmt. Relations
Maisnier v. National Vision, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07859
Plaintiff:
Paul F. Maisnier
Defendant:
National Vision, Inc. doing business as America's Best Contacts and Eyeglasses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Mendoza v. National Vision, Inc.
as 5:2019cv01485
Plaintiff:
Javier Mendoza
Defendant:
National Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Blansett v. U.S. Vision, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01027
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Blansett
Defendant:
U.S. Vision, Inc. and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hopper v. MGK Visions Inc. et al
as 2:2017at00879
Plaintiff:
Steven Hopper
Defendant:
MGK Visions Inc. and Zen Studios Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hopper v. MGK Visions Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01139
Plaintiff:
Steven Hopper
Defendant:
MGK Visions Inc. and Zen Studios Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeremy Maclean v. Calhoun Vision Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04129
Defendant:
Calhoun Vision Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Maclean
Johnson v. U.S. Vision, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00690
Plaintiff:
Debra M. Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Vision, Inc. , USV Optical, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Advanced Salon Visions, Inc. et al v. Lincoln Benefit Life Company et al
as 3:2008cv02346
Plaintiff:
Advanced Salon Visions, Inc., Mohsen Mokhtari and Advanced Salon Visions, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan
Defendant:
Lincoln Benefit Life Company, Principle Life Insurance Company, Conseco Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
