Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Philos Mechanical, LLC v. Fairbanks et al
as 0:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Philos Mechanical, LLC
Defendant:
Matthew Fairbanks, Jason Damman, Colin Beere and others
Counter Claimant:
Joseph Sellers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Leachman v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2019cv03009
Plaintiff:
Jack Leachman
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Blanch v. Riverbank Marina, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv00167
Defendant:
Riverbank Services, Inc., Phyllis Wood-Lasher, Riverbank Marina, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Blanch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sampsell v. J.M. Smucker Company, The et al
as 0:2015cv03759
Plaintiff:
Jack Sampsell, Sr.
Defendant:
J.M. Smucker Company, The and UnitedHealthcare
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jack v. American Eagle Airlines, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv00852
Plaintiff:
Sarah Jack
Defendant:
American Eagle Airlines, Inc. and The Group Health and Welfare Benefits Plan for Employees of American Eagle Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Wright v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Christin A. Wright, Christin A. Wright, Kathy L. Breiwick and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic, Inc., Arthur D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Brown v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv04904
Plaintiff:
Mark Brown, Mark Brown, Mark Brown and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., William A. Hawkins, Carol A. McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Cook et al v. Streyle Masonry, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv04724
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Cook, Richard C. Dentinger, Michael J. Cook and others
Defendant:
Streyle Masonry, Inc. and Jack W. Streyle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
