Cases 91 - 100 of 222
Alfred et al v. Walt Disney Company, The et al
as 1:2017cv02729
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Alfred, II , Ezequiel Martinez, Jr and Tova Laiter
Defendant:
The Walt Disney Compnay, Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group, Inc, Disney Consumer Productions and Interactive Media, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Walker v. Nathaniel
as 1:2017cv02586
Plaintiff:
Edmond Arthur Walker
Defendant:
Joshua Nathaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. City and County of Denver, Colorado et al
as 1:2017cv02528
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wright
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Colorado, Joseph R. Stadler, Joseph (I) R. Stadler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Borrega
as 1:2017cv02173
Plaintiff:
Arthur Moore
Defendant:
Deborah Borrega, Anthonty A. DeCesaro and Dayna Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noreja v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv02047
Plaintiff:
Arthur Noreja
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DeIanni v. Digital Touch, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01252
Plaintiff:
Arthur DeIanni
Defendant:
Digital Touch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Ellsworth v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01118
Plaintiff:
Arthur B. Ellsworth
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DeIanni v. Progress Printing Corporation
as 1:2017cv00737
Plaintiff:
Arthur DeIanni
Defendant:
Progress Printing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Arthur v. Moorehead
as 1:2017cv00734
Petitioner:
Terry K. Arthur
Respondent:
J. Moorehead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lomax v. Coffman et al
as 1:2016cv02833
Petitioner:
Arthur J. Lomax
Respondent:
Cynthia H. Coffman, Owens and Prison Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
