Cases 91 - 100 of 229
Bello v. USA
as 3:2016cv02235
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel Bello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gandia-Maysonet v. USA
as 3:2016cv02151
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel Gandia-Maysonet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barreto-Reyes et al v. Metropolitan Security Services, d/b/a Walden Security
as 3:2016cv02109
Defendant:
Metropolitan Security Services
Plaintiff:
Freddie Barreto-Reyes , Ivan Cruz-Morales , William Ortiz-Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Finance of America Reverse, LLC. v. Torres-Rosario et al
as 3:2016cv01692
Plaintiff:
Finance of America Reverse, LLC.
Defendant:
Felix Daniel Torres-Rosario, Josefina Quiles-Quinones, Conjugal Partnership Torres-Quiles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deering v. USA
as 3:2016cv01655
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Daniel Deering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Valentin-Rosado v. Edwards Lifesciences Technology Sarl
as 3:2015cv03122
Plaintiff:
Daniel O. Valentin-Rosado
Defendant:
Edwards Lifesciences Technology Sarl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos-Gonzalez v. Malave-Malave et al
as 3:2015cv03104
Plaintiff:
Josue Daniel Ramos-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Maria Malave-Malave and Universal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WM Capital Partners 51, LLC. v. Antonetty Auto Sales Corp. et al
as 3:2015cv03012
Plaintiff:
WM Capital Partners 51, LLC.
Defendant:
Antonetty Auto Sales Corp., Elliot Antonetty-Matos, Maria Luisa Fontanez-Montanez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Guerra-Jimenez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv02877
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Guerra-Jimenez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Rodriguez-Nieves
as 3:2015cv02828
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Daniel Rodriguez-Nieves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
