Cases 91 - 100 of 110
MORGAN v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00361
Petitioner:
CARL MORGAN
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TIDWELL v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00357
Petitioner:
DAVID DEWAYNE TIDWELL
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
QUEEN v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00345
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL R. QUEEN, JR.
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, JOHNATHAN C. MINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2007cv00343
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALES, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REYNOLDS v. MINER et al
as 1:2007cv00319
Petitioner:
KEITH REYNOLDS
Respondent:
JONATHAN MINER and ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2007cv00309
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. GONZALES
as 1:2007cv00317
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HILL
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AGUIRRE v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00267
Petitioner:
JORGE AGUIRRE
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
JIHAD v. GONZALES
as 1:2007cv00210
Plaintiff:
ABDUL NASIR JIHAD
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
