Cases 91 - 100 of 288
Brown v. Jakks Pacific, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01512
Defendant:
Zhao Xiaoqiang, Stephen G. Berman, Alexander Shoghi and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Persaud v. Brown et al
as 1:2020cv01378
Plaintiff:
Andrew Persaud
Defendant:
Richard H. Brown, Mary B. Cranston, Curtis J. Crawford and others
Nominal Defendant:
The Chemours Company
Gibbs et al v. Carney et al
as 1:2020cv01301
Plaintiff:
Joseph Parker, Justin Erskine, William Brocklehurst and others
Defendant:
John Carney, Department of Correction, Commissioner Claire DeMatteis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01245
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith-Miller v. Smith-Brown
as 1:2020cv01239
Defendant:
Cornelia A. Smith-Brown
Plaintiff:
Emilie B. Smith-Miller
Aliahmed et al v. Kondash et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Plaintiff:
Kelly E.S. Aliahmed, Evonca Sakinah S. Aliahmed, Muhammad Aliahmed and others
Defendant:
Lt. Ruth E. Dixon, Bureau Chief Shane Troxler, Deputy Warden John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01048
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. Vergnano et al
as 1:2020cv00995
Defendant:
Richard H. Brown, Mary B. Cranston, Mark E. Newman and others
Plaintiff:
Lesley Savage
Nominal Defendant:
The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE THE CHEMOURS COMPANY STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2020cv00989
Defendant:
Richard H. Brown, Mary B. Cranston, Curtis J. Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Brason Lee and Lesley Savage
Nominal Defendant:
The Chemours Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
