Cases 91 - 100 of 102
Lunford v. Neven et al
as 3:2008cv00146
Plaintiff:
Darren A. Lunford
Defendant:
D.W. Neven, Bruce Banister and C.O. Capper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lavoll v. Neven et al
as 2:2008cv00011
Petitioner:
Terrance Lederr Lavoll
Respondent:
D.W. Neven and The Attorney General Of The State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arrendondo v. Neven et al
as 2:2007cv01312
Petitioner:
Armis Arrendondo
Respondent:
D.W. Neven and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Olausen v. Neven
as 2:2008cv00004
Petitioner:
John Steven Olausen
Respondent:
D.W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartwell v. Neven et al
as 2:2007cv01371
Petitioner:
Willie Lamar Hartwell
Respondent:
D.W. Neven and The Attorney General Of The State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartwell v. Neven et al
as 2:2007cv01372
Petitioner:
Willie Lamar Hartwell
Respondent:
D.W. Neven and The Attorney General Of The State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrendondo v. Nv Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv01313
Plaintiff:
Armis Arrendondo
Defendant:
Nv Dept of Corrections, D.W. Neven, Shaulis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunford v. Neven et al
as 2:2007cv01067
Plaintiff:
Darren A. Lunford
Defendant:
D.W. Neven, Isidro Baca, Orenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ono v. Neven et al
as 2:2007cv00687
Petitioner:
Victor Anthony Ono
Respondent:
D.W. Neven
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodius v. Neven et al
as 2:2007cv00602
Petitioner:
David John Rodius
Respondent:
D.W. Neven and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
