Cases 91 - 100 of 315
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00043
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00012
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nguyen v. Holder et al
as 4:2012cv03709
Petitioner:
Hai Thanh Nguyen
Respondent:
Eric H Holder, Jr and Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baney v. Holder
as 3:2012cv05142
Plaintiff:
John-Pierre Baney
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baney v. Holder
as 3:2012cv05140
Plaintiff:
John-Pierre Baney
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bacchus et al v. Holder et al
as 7:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Reginald Bacchus and Bernard Talbert
Defendant:
G. Dah and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Retaliation by Prison Offical
Bacchus et al v. U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr et al
as 4:2012cv03551
Plaintiff:
Reginald Bacchus and Bernard Talbert
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr and G. Dah, Officer of GEO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
