Cases 91 - 97 of 97
Wyatt v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 4:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wyatt
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The Group Short Term and Long Term Disability Plan For Employees of Aerospace Testing Alliance-Wage Union and Aerospace Testing Alliance-Wage Union
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCowen v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2008cv00156
Plaintiff:
Bonnie McCowen
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Barber v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
Pamela Barber
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hodoly v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv00395
Plaintiff:
John Hodoly
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Blair v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 3:2007cv00583
Plaintiff:
Yun Blair, Yun Blair and Yun Blair
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of Vanderbilt University and Vanderbilt University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mash v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00443
Plaintiff:
Pamela Mash
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Waite v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 3:2007cv00119
Plaintiff:
Debra Waite and Debra Waite
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
