Cases 91 - 100 of 171
FREDERICK v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2007cv00335
Petitioner:
DARRYL FREDERICK
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Small v. McDonough et al
as 0:2007cv61064
Petitioner:
Curtis Small
Respondent:
James McDonough and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00179
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NORTON v. MALLION et al
as 5:2007cv00174
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE JAY NORTON
Defendant:
JAMES MALLION, JAMES MCDONOUGH, PEREZ BELLESLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aitken v. McDonough
as 3:2007cv00630
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Aitken
Defendant:
James McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LINDSAY v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00309
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L LINDSAY
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH and MS BLOCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2007cv00287
Plaintiff:
THIAMOND D KING
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv00605
Plaintiff:
Thiamond King
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and James McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KOHN v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00148
Petitioner:
KEITH KOHN
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LINDSAY v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 5:2007cv00150
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L LINDSAY
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH, ALEX TAYLOR and ROBERT JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
