Cases 91 - 100 of 111
Harris v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 9:2011cv80414
Plaintiff:
John Robert Harris
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Bayer Schering Pharma A.G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Unique Vacations, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv24217
Plaintiff:
John Robert Johnson and Diana Cantu
Defendant:
Unique Vacations, Inc., Sandals Resorts International, Ltd and Sandals Grande St. Lucian Spa and Beach Resort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2010cv01902
Plaintiff:
John Roberts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
DE BEERS CENTENARY AG v. Hasson
as 1:2010cv23024
Petitioner:
DE BEERS CENTENARY AG
Respondent:
John Robert Hasson
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
DEMOS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2010cv00068
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. The United States of America
as 5:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DEMOS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv00050
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Demos v. USA et al
as 2:2010cv14065
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
USA and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv14034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Marmolejo v. J.J.R. Construction Co. et al
as 9:2009cv80749
Plaintiff:
Filiberto Medina Marmolejo
Defendant:
J.J.R. Construction Co. and John Roberts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
