Cases 91 - 100 of 1,016
Furrow v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00478
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
James D. Furrow, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
West v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00059
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Robert F West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
White v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00458
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Francis B. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Held v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00457
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Held
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Draughn v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00042
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Tammy A. Draughn
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Parsons v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00030
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Parsons
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cook v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00029
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Terry W. Cook
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00028
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Brenda G. Jones
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Umberger v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00454
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Connie F. Umberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Glass v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00672
Plaintiff:
Wanda Glass
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
