Cases 91 - 100 of 122
Conigliaro et al v. National Grid
as 1:2012cv05627
Plaintiff:
Michael Conigliaro, Danny Deluca, John Deluca and others
Defendant:
National Grid
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05475
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pirro et al v. National Grid et al
as 5:2012cv01364
Plaintiff:
Steven Pirro, Charles L. Reiser, Becky Badalato and others
Defendant:
National Grid, Niagara Mohawk Pension Plan and Niagara Mohawk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Richmond v. National Grid et al
as 1:2012cv01319
Defendant:
National Grid and US Energy Savings
Plaintiff:
Edith Richmond
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tomaszewski et al v. Rapid Transit Mix Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv06002
Plaintiff:
Jerzy Tomaszewski , Dominick DeRosa and Nelson Torres
Defendant:
Rapid Transit Mix Corp., All American Concrete Supply Corp., Morgan Concrete Leasing Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
