Cases 91 - 100 of 330
Phyllis Lewandoski v. The National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2018cv00879
Defendant:
DOES and The National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Lewandoski
Varian v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2017at00964
Plaintiff:
Vern Varian
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Varian v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2017cv01734
Plaintiff:
Vern Varian
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jose Miguel Rivas v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv08770
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jose Duran Rivas
James v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
as 3:2017cv06645
Plaintiff:
Sheila James
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Erin A. Galicia v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv08020
Defendant:
AMTRAK, Does, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Erin Galicia
Nevis v. Rideout Memorial Hospital, et al.,
as 2:2017cv02295
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Nevis
Defendant:
Rideout Memorial Hospital, Hector Lopez, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
L. v. State of California et al
as 3:2017cv06242
Plaintiff:
N. L.
Defendant:
State of California, State of California Department of Transportation aka CALTRANS, The City of Oakland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deidre Fisher v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2017cv07717
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Diedre Fisher
Peggy Rudnick v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al
as 2:2017cv05568
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Peggy Rudnick
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
