Cases 91 - 100 of 115
Ortiz v. Curry et al
as 3:2008cv04663
Petitioner:
Roberto Ortiz
Respondent:
B. Curry and California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Sisto
as 4:2008cv04642
Petitioner:
Craig Johnson
Respondent:
D.K. Sisto and California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carbajal v. Curry et al
as 4:2008cv04501
Petitioner:
Jose D. Carbajal
Respondent:
B. Curry and California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald Green v. The State of California Board of Parole Hearing et al
as 2:2008cv06124
Petitioner:
Donald Green
Respondent:
The State of California Board of Parole Hearing and Larry Small
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plata v. California Board of Parole Hearings
as 1:2008cv01356
Petitioner:
David Plata
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramon Birl v. California Board of Parole Hea
as 08-16886
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAMON BIRL
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
Thomas v. California Board of Parole Hearings
as 3:2008cv03901
Petitioner:
Jerome Thomas, II
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nantes v. Davis et al
as 2:2008cv01684
Plaintiff:
Florentino Nantes
Defendant:
James Davis and California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Claiborne v. Sisto et al
as 2:2008cv01626
Petitioner:
Kevin Claiborne
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto, California Board of Parole Hearings and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hines v. Sisto et al
as 2:2008cv01415
Petitioner:
Larry Hines
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto, Attorney General CA and California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
