Cases 91 - 100 of 8,344
BARNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03337
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L. BARNES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLEMING v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv03274
Plaintiff:
RHONDA FLEMING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND and COLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv02753
Plaintiff:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02741
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DELISIO v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv03351
Plaintiff:
RONALD MICHAEL DELISIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF OHIO, OFFICE OF THE BISHOP - DIOCESE OF CLEVELAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
VISCONTI v. SEPE et al
as 1:2023cv03202
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
LOUIS SEPE, LACBA IDP, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKERMAN v. DOIRON
as 1:2023cv02575
Plaintiff:
MARTIN AKERMAN
Defendant:
SHERRI DOIRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Anthony Braxton v. USA
as 23-5221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
