Cases 101 - 110 of 457
United States of America v. $200,080.00 (US), in rem et al
as 1:2018cv01977
Defendant:
$200,080.00 (US), in rem and $4,195.00 (US), in rem
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. Three (3) Real Properties, in rem
as 3:2018cv01589
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Three (3) Real Properties, in rem
Claimant:
Alice Lim and Clackamas County Assessor's Office
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. One Smith & Wesson Pistol et al
as 6:2018cv01528
Defendant:
One Smith & Wesson Pistol and 17 Rounds of Ammunition
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. $21,306.00 (US), in rem
as 6:2018cv01038
Defendant:
$21,306.00 (US), in rem
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. $50,000 (US)
as 3:2017cv01928
Defendant:
$50,000 (US)
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. 5 Assorted Firearms
as 6:2017cv01787
Defendant:
5 Assorted Firearms
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. 10503 Campus Way, Upper Marlboro, MD
as 1:2017cv01619
Defendant:
10503 Campus Way South, Upper Marlboro, Prince George's County, State and District of Maryland
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
USA v. $26,000 (US)
as 3:2017cv01595
Defendant:
$26,000.00 (US)
Claimant:
Steven Rau
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $62,044.00 (US)
as 6:2017cv01285
Defendant:
$62,044.00 in U.S. Currency, in rem
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $79,900.00 (US)
as 6:2017cv01232
Defendant:
$79,900.00 (US)
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
