Cases 101 - 110 of 143
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. a California corporation dba 24 Hour Fitness v. Dyer
as 4:2011cv04276
Plaintiff:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. a California corporation dba 24 Hour Fitness
Defendant:
Robert Dyer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. a California corporation dba 24 Hour Fitness v. Vicha
as 4:2011cv04272
Plaintiff:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. a California corporation dba 24 Hour Fitness
Defendant:
Nicole Vicha
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. Fontenot
as 1:2011cv01051
Petitioner:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.
Respondent:
Kirk Fontenot
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc v. Smith
as 3:2011cv03395
Petitioner:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America Inc
Respondent:
Don Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC., a California Corporation, dba 24 HOUR FITNESS v. THOMPSON
as 4:2011cv00806
Petitioner:
24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC., a California Corporation, dba 24 HOUR FITNESS
Respondent:
ROBERT THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc v. Kuo
as 3:2011cv03391
Petitioner:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc
Respondent:
Tony Kuo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
24 Hour Fitness, a California Corporation, dba 24 Hour Fitness v. Bubel
as 4:2011cv00850
Petitioner:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc
Respondent:
Matt Bubel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC. v. SMITH
as 3:2011cv03388
Petitioner:
24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC.
Respondent:
DON SMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc v. Burt
as 3:2011cv03387
Petitioner:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America Inc
Respondent:
Terri Burt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc v. Troell
as 4:2011cv00849
Plaintiff:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc
Defendant:
Kimberly Troell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
