Cases 101 - 110 of 305
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2020cv02960
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Marco Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv02963
Defendant:
Warden and Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Marco Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knight v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv50151
Plaintiff:
Joseph Knight
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv00288
Defendant:
B. True, Officer Clarke, Officer Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Nojan Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gozo v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv01754
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Homeland Security and GEO Group Inc.
Petitioner:
Makusha Gozo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Due v. Werlich et al
as 3:2019cv01340
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons Central-Washington DC, Warden Werlich and FCI-Greenville
Petitioner:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Due v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2019cv01218
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Associate Warden Messer, Warden Werlich and others
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landis v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2019cv50290
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firemarms and Explosives, Executive Office of United States Attorneys, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Due v. Bureau of Prisons Central et al
as 3:2019cv01168
Defendant:
Warden Gomez, Associate Warden Messer, Lt John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tomkins v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2019cv01304
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Andrew Lamirand, Steven Kallis and others
Plaintiff:
John P Tomkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
