Cases 101 - 110 of 284
Nathan Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al
as 20-35085
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH YORDY, Warden, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Dickson v. Idaho Department of Correction
as 1:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction
Plaintiff:
Keith Dickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al
as 20-35009
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTENSEN, Warden, STATE OF IDAHO, HENRY ATENCIO, Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Nathan Byerly v. John Doe Governor, et al
as 20-35003
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KENNETH MEZO, MARK WORTHINGTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Garcia v. Idaho State Correction Center et al
as 1:2020cv00001
Defendant:
Adam Miller, Jay Christensen, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Daniel Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2019cv00509
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections and State of Idaho
Plaintiff:
James Darnell Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Merchant v. Corizon Health, Inc., et al
as 19-36093
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, LLC, DAVID AGLER, M.D. and JOHN MIGLIORI, M.D.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY L. MERCHANT
Defendant:
KEITH YORDY, Warden, DOES, John/Jane I-X; Whose true identities are presently unknown, CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Feagins v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 1:2019cv00472
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Idaho Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Tom Feagins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 19-35917
Defendant / Appellant:
MURRAY YOUNG, CORIZON, INC., JEFF ZUMDA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADREE EDMO, AKA Mason Edmo
Maurer v. Idaho Department of Correction
as 19-1419
Respondent / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN BRENT MAURER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
