Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 171
NEALY v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00278
Petitioner: ANTHONY NEALY
Respondent: JAMES MCDONOUGH and BILL MCCOLLUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00143
Petitioner: BRIAN TAYLOR
Respondent: JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parent v. McDonough
as 9:2007cv80514
Petitioner: Richard T. Parent
Respondent: James McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2007cv00271
Petitioner: MAURICE A WILLIAMS
Respondent: JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REYES v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00131
Petitioner: RAUL REYES
Respondent: JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHARLESTON v. MCDONOUGH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv00260
Petitioner: DERRICK CHARLESTON
Respondent: JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdul-Hakim v. Jameson et al
as 3:2007cv00483
Plaintiff: Rasikh Abdul-Hakim
Defendant: Daniel Jameson, Howell Winfree, J. Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Cheeseman et al
as 3:2007cv00485
Plaintiff: Robin Moore
Defendant: Jerry Cheeseman, Hiep Nguyen, Steven Singer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEALY v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00235
Petitioner: ANTHONY NEALY
Respondent: JAMES MCDONOUGH and BILL MCCOLLUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. McDonough et al
as 3:2007cv00451
Plaintiff: Stuart Alexander
Defendant: James McDonough, T. Graham, Rod Tadlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?