Cases 101 - 110 of 344
Garrett v. Werholtz et al
as 1:2013cv01379
Appellant:
Michael Garrett
Respondent:
Roger Werholtz , Frances Falk and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Trani et al
as 1:2013cv01273
Petitioner:
Leo Simmons
Respondent:
Travis Trani and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oliver v. Clements et al
as 1:2013cv01076
Petitioner:
Greggory Wade Oliver
Respondent:
Tom Clements and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crownhart v. Suthers et al
as 1:2013cv00959
Petitioner:
Earl J. Crownhart
Respondent:
John Suthers and James X. Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crownhart v. Suthers et al
as 1:2013cv00862
Petitioner:
Earl J. Crownhart
Respondent:
John Suthers and John X. Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crownhart v. Suthers et al
as 1:2013cv00835
Petitioner:
Earl J. Crownhart
Respondent:
John Suthers and James X. Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Suthers et al
as 1:2013cv00817
Plaintiff:
Douglas Wilson
Defendant:
John Suthers, Travis Trani, Danial May and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Houston v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 1:2013cv00784
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Houston
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Michael Hancock, John Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noor v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2013cv00692
Plaintiff:
Wanda Leilani Noor
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, John Suthers and Nyle Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Cortez v. People of the State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2013cv00524
Petitioner:
Byron Cortez
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, The , Francis Falk and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
