Cases 101 - 110 of 487
Gist v. Anderson et al
as 5:2012cv01208
Plaintiff:
Jewell Wesley Gist
Defendant:
Ronald A Anderson, Diana Jones, Alan Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beard v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv01160
Plaintiff:
James Beard
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Warden McCollum and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv01163
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Petitioner:
Henry Floyd Love, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prather v. Jones
as 5:2012cv01149
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mario Williams
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Tim Wilkinson and Brian Wideman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Jones
as 5:2012cv01122
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taber v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv01113
Plaintiff:
Barclay Taber
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Claude Chester and Teresa Holsten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv01080
Plaintiff:
Margarita Gonzalez
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Millicent Newton-Embry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Prather v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv01072
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Justin Jones and Rita Cooksey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klein v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv01064
Petitioner:
Quinn Aaron Klein
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
