Cases 101 - 110 of 560
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv04584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv04588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01826
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
National Council for Adoption v. Michael Pompeo, et al
as 20-5158
Defendant / Appellee:
Trish Maskew, in her official capacity as Chief of the Adoptions Division, U.S. Department of State, Michael R. Pompeo, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of State, United States Department of State and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
National Council for Adoption
IBRAHIM v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2020cv01412
Defendant:
JOHN ABIZAID, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, U.S. CONSULATE, RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA and others
Plaintiff:
AHMED IBRAHIM
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 055
DBRITTO v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2020cv01397
Defendant:
KENNETH I. JUSTER, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, U.S. CONSULATE GENERAL IN MUMBAI and others
Plaintiff:
MACVIN DBRITTO
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
ABAYAN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv01373
Defendant:
U.S. CONSULATE, MANILA, PHILIPPINES, CHAD WOLF, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Plaintiff:
ASISCLO ABAYAN
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
