Cases 101 - 110 of 120
Adams v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv03272
Plaintiff:
Kendrick L Adams
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Illinois Department of Corrections, Louis Shicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. Wexford Health Services Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02153
Plaintiff:
Terry Gray
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services Inc, Keith Anglin, . Calloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2012cv03011
Plaintiff:
Gary N Oliphant
Defendant:
Michael Randle, James Sledge, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judy v. Obaisi et al
as 3:2011cv03422
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Judy
Defendant:
Saleh Obaisi, Lisa Lercher, Wexford Health Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor, Jr. v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv07386
Plaintiff:
John E Taylor, Jr
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Kevin C. Halloran, Allan Karraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barajas v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00887
Plaintiff:
Jose Barajas
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Randy Davis, Michael Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montague v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05080
Plaintiff:
Ramon Montague
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Partha Ghosh, Dr. Liping Zhang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2011cv00571
Plaintiff:
Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Michael Puisis, Michael Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockett v. Randle et al
as 3:2011cv03109
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lockett
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. IDOC
as 3:2011cv00158
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
IDOC, Roger Walker Jr, Michael P Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
