Cases 101 - 110 of 10,117
Jones v. Edmonds et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo L. Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney Edmonds, U.S. Attorney Williams, Det. Slater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taylor v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor doing business as New Muslim Party, Corp
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clingman v. Washington County Sherriff's Dept.
as 3:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clingman
Defendant:
Washington County Sherriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barton v. Bower et al
as 6:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Dale Alan Barton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Bower, MD, Michelle Davies, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanderhoof v. Reyes
as 2:2024cv00443
Petitioner:
Mark Allen Vanderhoof
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Mrs. Davies and David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Oregon Democratic Party
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor doing business as New Muslim Party, Corp
Defendant:
Oregon Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zargaryan v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Armen Zargaryan
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Covington v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Agyei Covington
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
