Cases 111 - 120 of 7,198
Lettieri v. Broome County Humane Society et al
as 1:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Broome County Humane Society, Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. The Broome County Humane Society et al
as 1:2023cv01270
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
The Broome County Humane Society and David Gaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Stodemaier et al
as 1:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
Jebb Baldwin
Defendant:
Sergeant Douglas Stodemaier, Doctor Snellgrove and Lieutenant Anthony Vitucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Vilardo
as 6:2023cv06690
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Lawrence Joseph Vilardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Federal Marshals
as 1:2023cv01259
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Federal Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Vilardo
as 6:2023cv06682
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Lawrence Joseph Vilardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguirre v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
Jairo Aguirre
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Joey Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reibel v. Superintendent Hill
as 6:2023cv06671
Petitioner:
Michael J. Reibel
Respondent:
Superintendent Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lettieri v. City of Binghamton
as 1:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
City of Binghamton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabell v. Doe et al
as 6:2023cv06669
Plaintiff:
Derrell Cabell
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
