Cases 111 - 120 of 10,117
InTrustment Northwest, Inc. v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
InTrustment Northwest, Inc.
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Vivek Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sawyer et al v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Kent Sawyer and Sandra Lynn Short
Defendant:
Deschutes County, L. Shane Nelson, Michael Schults and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armas v. Highberger
as 6:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
Richard Bryan Armas
Respondent:
J. Highberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melchor-Guzman v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
Alexis Melchor-Guzman
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGee v. Pedro et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Menphrey Douglas McGee
Defendant:
David Pedro, Liza Emory, B. Kubesh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 1:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Anthony Wayne Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
J.G.T. v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
J. G.T.
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, FELICIA JONES and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Edmonds et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo L. Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney Edmonds, U.S. Attorney Williams, Det. Slater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pacheco v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Amado Pacheco
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
D.W. v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
D.W.
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Kimberly Macias and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
