Cases
Cases 111 - 119 of 119
EON Corp, IP Holdings, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01555
Interested Party: Belkin International, Inc., Broadcom Corp., Qualcomm-Atheros, Inc. and others
Defendant: Telefonica de Puerto Rico, Inc., AT&T, Inc, AT&T Mobility LLC. and others
Not Classified By Court: Hon. Edward A. Infante
Petitioner: Hewlett Packard Company
Plaintiff: EON Corp, IP Holdings, LLC and Sony Electronics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. DEALERS WARRANTY, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01814
Defendant: JOHN DOE NO. 1, DEALERS WARRANTY, LLC doing business as "FEDERAL AUTO PROTECTION", NATIONAL DEALERS WARRANTY, INC. doing business as "NATIONAL DEALERS WARRANTY" and others
Not Classified By Court: JUSTICE GARY S. STEIN
Plaintiff: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS and ONSTAR, LLC.
3Rd Party Plaintiff: DEALERS WARRANTY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EMR Policy Institute v. FCC
as 08-1383
Appellant: EMR Policy Institute
Appellee: Federal Communications Commission
Intervenor For Appellee: Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless
Cellco Prtnshp v. FCC, et al
as 08-1070
Petitioner: Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
AT&T Wireless Svc, et al v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 03-1043
Petitioner: AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., Cingular Wireless LLC and Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor: AirCell, Inc.
Terminated Party: ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited, Constellation Communications Holdings Inc. and Ellipso, Inc.
Cellco Prtnshp v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 02-1262
Petitioner: Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Cell Telecom, et al v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 02-1264
Petitioner: Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association and Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner: Cingular Wireless LLC, Rural Telecommunications Group, Dobson Communications Corporation and others
Intervenor: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Verizon Telephone Companies, Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States and others
NextWave Prsnal Comm, et al v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 00-1402
Petitioner: NextWave Personal Communications Inc. and NextWave Power Partners, Inc.
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent: BellSouth Corporation, BellSouth Cellular Corporation, Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association and others
Intervenor: Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless, VoiceStream Wireless Corporation, AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. and others
Terminated Party: Nextel Communications, Inc.
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: Kenneth N. Klee, Robert E. Torricelli, Senator, Charles E. Schumer, Senator and others
AT&T Wireless Svc, et al v. FCC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 00-1304
Appellant - Appellant: AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless and Cingular Wireless LLC
Appellant - Terminated Party: BellSouth Cellular Corporation and SBC Wireless, Inc.
Appellee - Appellee: Federal Communications Commission
Intervenor: Northeast Communications of Wisconsin, Inc., doing business as Cellcom, Western Wireless Corporation, AirCell, Inc. and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Rural Cellular Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?