Cases 111 - 120 of 288
CAMACHO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08178
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AMILCAR CAMACHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SANTOS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96822
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CAMACHO SANTOS JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMACHO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv95828
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TJ CAMACHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMACHO v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2020cv00472
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JAMONT, MCKINNON and others
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL CAMACHO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melbourne v. Orange County Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv01587
Defendant:
William Rodriguez Rivera, Christopher Camacho and Orange County Corrections
Plaintiff:
Neal Owen Melbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMACHO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81904
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CASTANEDA CAMACHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMACHO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv79498
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHARLEEN C CAMACHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Camacho v. Social Security
as 1:2020cv23268
Defendant:
Social Security
Plaintiff:
Martha A. Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
CAMACHO JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67429
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO T CAMACHO JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
