Cases 111 - 120 of 127
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. Kenneth Cameron, et al
as 13-1924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH CAMERON, As Superintendent SCI Cresson, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Nelson Birdwell
as 13-1794
Petitioner:
In re: NELSON BIRDWELL
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Dana Young, Sr. v. Robert Shannon, et al
as 13-1650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA E. YOUNG, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT SHANNON, Superintendent, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Gabriel Pittman v. Jerome Walsh, et al
as 13-1602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL I. PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEROME WALSH, SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Inell Foye v. Kenneth Cameron, et al
as 13-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INELL FOYE
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and KENNETH CAMERON
William Tirado v. Michael Klopotoski, et al
as 12-4600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LICIAGO TIRADO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, SUPT. SCI DALLAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
In re: Gabriel Pittman
as 12-4388
Petitioner:
In re: GABRIEL I. PITTMAN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
Randy Hinkley v. DA Lehigh County, et al
as 12-4152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY CARL HINKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Gabriel Pittman
as 12-4005
Petitioner:
In re: GABRIEL I. PITTMAN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
Daniel Kerrigan v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 12-3530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL KERRIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
