Cases 111 - 120 of 369
GRIGGER v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL et al
as 3:2020cv14491
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, BRIAN M. HUGHES, MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK E. GRIGGER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. A.C.L.U.-NJ et al
as 3:2020cv14349
Defendant:
JERSEY ELLIS, ANGELO J. ONOFRI, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
LAMAUR HILL, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADSBERY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv14350
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, JARED MAPLES, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
RYJOHN BRADSBERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv13152
Plaintiff:
BELINDA ELLIS and JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DARBY v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2020cv12944
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, JARED MAPLES, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
MARION DARBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv12949
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, JARED MAPLES, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv12952
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, JARED MAPLES, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND INGLAM and RAYMOND INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAM v. SFLG INC. et al
as 3:2020cv12835
Plaintiff:
CINDY ADAM
Defendant:
SFLG INC. and KURT ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BETHEA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv12790
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, JARED MAPLES, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BETHEA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv12726
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, WELLS FARGO CENTER and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
