Cases 111 - 120 of 3,055
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Cogo Solutions, Incorporated, et al
as 2:2023cv04188
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation and others
Defendant:
COGO SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, Steven Wong, M.D. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
D'AmbolA et al v. Daily Harvest, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04313
Plaintiff:
Kathryn D'Ambola and Christopher D'Ambola
Defendant:
Daily Harvest Inc., Police Officers John Does 1-10, ABC Corps. 1-10 and others
Cross Defendant:
Second Bite Foods, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Compere v. MTGLQ Investors LP et al
as 1:2023cv04669
Defendant:
MTGLQ Investors LP, Selene Finance LP, McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marie S Compere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Menczer v. Rochlitz et al
as 1:2023cv04096
Plaintiff:
Joseph Menczer, Naftaly Mayer Rochlitz and Brenda Rochlitz
Defendant:
Chaim Rochlitz, Binyomin Z. Bendet and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bayside Wellness Physical Therapy, PC et al v. Double Why Design, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03842
Plaintiff:
Bayside Wellness Physical Therapy, PC and Naon Physical Therapy P.C.
Defendant:
Double Why Design, Inc., Young Jun Youn, Barbra Joanne Mangibin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bayside Wellness Physical Therapy, P.C. et al v. Double Why Design, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03842
Plaintiff:
Bayside Wellness Physical Therapy, P.C. and Naon Physical Therapy P.C.
Defendant:
Double Why Design, Inc., Young Jun Youn, Barbra Joanne Mangibin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv03981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Burris v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2023cv06267
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. Burris
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Investigator Stephanie Burgstrom, City of Rochester Police Officer John Does #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
