Cases 111 - 120 of 175
Cofield v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael Cofield
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Daniel Hofmeister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burney v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00431
Plaintiff:
Richard Burney
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Briggette Adams
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitacre v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
Nancy F. Whitacre
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Commonwealth Surgical Solutions, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mason v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00393
Plaintiff:
Robert Mason
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doss v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00390
Plaintiff:
Gail Doss
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daugherty v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00392
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Daugherty
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leonard v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Leonard, Jr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ludwig v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
William Ludwig
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linge v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00374
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Louise Linge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
